GlobeCore FAQ
I am interested in a laboratory colloid mill for producing emulsion products (technical applications). What equipment can you recommend?
- This topic has 3 replies, 4 voices, and was last updated 1 week, 5 days ago by .
Answers
-
March 27, 2026 at 2:28 pm by Oliver Andersen
For laboratory-scale emulsions, the key is a colloid mill with adjustable rotor-stator gap and high shear rate, since emulsification requires strong mechanical ??????????? to reduce droplet size and stabilize the mixture .
For this purpose, a model like GlobeCore CLM-0.25.1 laboratory colloid mill is a good starting point. It is designed specifically for homogenization and emulsification of liquid systems and viscous technical products, allowing you to test formulations and process parameters in lab conditions . It also works well as a pilot step before scaling to industrial production.
If you plan to work with different types of emulsions (oils, ?????????? ???????, ???????), it’s important to choose a configuration with temperature control and recirculation, since many technical emulsions are sensitive to viscosity and processing ?????.
In practice, CLM-type mills are widely used in technical fields (lubricants, coatings, chemical emulsions), so a laboratory unit like CLM-0.25.1 would be a logical and flexible solution for your tasks. -
April 28, 2026 at 6:47 am by Craig Price
Another practical point to consider in laboratory emulsification is not only the shear level, but also how mechanical impact is generated inside the rotor–stator system. In colloid mills, emulsification occurs due to a combination of shearing, grinding, and high-speed dispersion forces, which are generated by the relative motion between the rotor and the stator.
For this reason, in lab work, it is often important to focus on fine adjustment of the working gap and flow conditions, since even small changes may significantly affect droplet size distribution and emulsion stability. In addition, when working with different types of systems (for example, oils, chemical emulsions, or polymer-based mixtures), engineers often use recirculation loops to achieve a more uniform structure rather than relying on a single pass through the mill.
Another useful consideration is that laboratory units are not only for testing formulations, but also for simulating industrial conditions on a smaller scale. Units such as the GlobeCore CLM-100.2, for example, operate in the range of approximately 0.1–1 m³/h, which makes them suitable for bridging lab experiments and pilot-scale validation.
If you’d like to gain a deeper understanding of how laboratory colloid mills are configured and how parameters such as gap adjustment, flow conditions, and rotor–stator geometry influence the final emulsion quality, I recommend reviewing this resource: https://globecore.com/milling/lab-colloid-mill-clm-100-2/. -
April 28, 2026 at 6:52 am by David Allen
You’re absolutely right: emulsification in a colloid mill is as much about how the rotor–stator interaction is engineered as it is about sheer energy input. In practice I recommend approaching lab work by treating gap adjustment, rotor/stator tooling and flow strategy as your primary control knobs. Start with tooling that matches the mechanism you want (nozzle-style/close-gap rotor–stator for high shear and fine droplet breakup; knife/rougher tooling when you need more grinding/size reduction), set a conservative axial gap and run a recirculation loop rather than a single pass, and monitor droplet size and viscosity after defined numbers of passes. Control of temperature (jacketed milling zone) and feed rate is critical: viscosity changes with temperature, which directly affects droplet breakup and stability, and small gap changes (fractions of a millimeter) will shift droplet size distribution significantly.
For choice of equipment, use the smallest unit that gives you the throughputs and control you need for reproducible screening, and move up to a pilot-scale bench when you need process validation. For formulation screening and small lab batches the CLM-0.25.1 is a compact option (axial gap adjustable roughly 0.25–1.25 mm, fixed radial gap ~0.25 mm, knife-tip speeds ≈50–57 m/s, jacketed up to ~150 °C, minimum practical throughput ≈25 L/h). If you need to bridge lab to pilot or run larger lab validation runs, the CLM-100.2 covers roughly 0.1–1 m3/h with adjustable axial gaps around 0.2–2 mm, similar high shear tip speeds and higher temperature capability up to ~180 °C. For lab-to-small-production scale with higher product volumes, the CLM-250.3 gives the next step up (higher flow, axial gaps ~0.3–2 mm and a more robust drive). In all cases, plan experiments with controlled recirculation, incremental gap changes, and droplet-size/viscosity checks so you can map process settings to emulsion quality before scaling.